Home
Invest now, or pay later E-mail

PPTA poster negotiations for secondary teacher collective agreement 2010

‘If you think education is expensive, try ignorance’ – never has that observation been more relevant.
The country – along with much of the world – is being pounded by the economic crisis. Unemployment is rising while everyone agrees we need more qualified school leavers.

...Their plight belongs to all of us, for it will certainly cost us all.

We have a government that has talked up its intention to invest in infrastructure. Surely, for a nation proud of its achievements and ambitious for its future, that begins with intellectual infrastructure?

Other countries are already upping their investment in public education. They have recognised that, when times are tough, priming the knowledge pump reaps returns. The head of the International Monetary Fund, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, noted in January 2010 that “investment in education in stimulus packages will have much more effect than tax cuts.”


Much of this education investment around the world has been directed at teaching; quality learning is, after all, an outcome of quality teaching.

Attracting and retaining the teachers we need comes down to how much we’re willing to pay. Right now, New Zealand teachers have one of the lowest starting salaries in the developed world, yet they work some of the longest hours. After 15 years’ experience, a New Zealand secondary teacher’s salary is 17% lower than the OECD average.

The PPTA is asking for a 4% salary increase. Comparatively, that’s moderate. The teachers of Queensland and South Australia have just been awarded double digit percentage pay rises.

The Australians think their children are worth the investment. They know that ignorance isn’t bliss… more likely a nightmare.

Are we to move forward with our neighbours, or slip even further behind?

 

 

Comments (1)add comment

David Williams said:

Overall NZ's spend on education higher than Australia's
A recent OECD report http://www.oecd.org/document/2...1_1,00.htm shows in table B2.1 that NZ spends 4.3% of its GDP on primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education. This compares to an OECD average of 3.7% of GDP and to Australia at 4.0% of GDP. I think it is these relative figures that are more important than abosulute figures. We all know we can get paid more in Australia. That's because Australia is a richer country. These figures must be looked at in relative terms.
 
September 28, 2010
Votes: +3

Write comment

busy
Last Updated on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 09:01