PPTA

  • Full Screen
  • Wide Screen
  • Narrow Screen
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
YOU ARE HERE Resources > Pigeonhole - PPTA blog > Tags > Maori achievement
Tags >> Maori achievement

The people who want our children to have charter schools had a little get together in the weekend. They are called the ACT party - not polling very well - but the current government seem to quite like some of their ideas.


 

So a day after announcing the closure of two residential special schools, Parata announces the government is going to be giving $3 million a year to Wanganui Collegiate.

Collegiate is a decile 10 school, which according to the 2011 ERO report had no Pasifika students and 11% Maori.

The same ERO report praised its ‘relatively small class sizes’ which enabled teachers to know their students well, and commented on the ‘success rates considerably above national comparison levels.’ Yep, well that’s what a top private school is supposed to do, right?

 

Parata and Longstone have been berating schools and teachers to raise the achievement of Maori, Pasifika, special needs and students from low-socio-economic status families  - these are supposed to be the priority learners that are the Minister’s ‘unrelenting’ focus.


The Office of the Auditor General (OAG) has announced a 5 year foray into Māori education.

"School visits for education performance inquiry
Radio NZ, 22 August 2012
About 30 schools are to get a visit from from the Auditor-General's office, as part of a new drive to make regular checks on how well the education system is supporting Maori students."

It seems the OAG has spare resources and is looking for work. The OAG document "Education for Maori: Context for our proposed audit work until 2017" is a document of somewhat selective references. It has a five year plan for this and a very very select group of advisors.
But why is the OAG duplicating work in an area that another statutory body is responsible for? It seems a wasteful duplication and use of the financial and human resources of government and schools.

The Education Review Office is set up specifically to evaluate and report on the education and care of students in schools and early childhood services.  

Within the Education Review office the leadership team have extensive education experience and qualifications including in the area of Maori education.

"The Education Review Office (ERO) plays a valuable role as an agency for change in the education system. ERO has a quite specific legislative role – to review and report on the performance of schools and early childhood services. Increasingly, however, ERO regards its institutional reviews and national evaluation reports as levers for system change. ERO’s findings are used by services, schools, the Ministry of Education, and other policy agencies."







Charter schools - New Zealand education for sale  - - you can buy anonymously Wink it's a captive market, guaranteed income from the taxpayer and regulation free, ...  sign up here.

'I can be objective' says Isaac - and my appointment is not political

Well tie me to an anthill and smear my ears with jam!  I just couldn't maintain my zen listening to Catherine Isaac on Native Affairs. Cynic is back.

Have a listen to this paragon of virtue on Native Affairs and then tell me she's objective.


More to the picture

Posted by: Cynic

Surface readings

Today my head hurts from trying to follow up on a NZ Herald story that quotes from the Unesco report  Reaching the marginalised (Education For All global monitoring report 2010):

year 11 Maori students enrolled in kura kaupapa immersion schools did significantly better than Maori in English-language schools (p.206)

so I tried to follow up. I looked at Nga Haeata Matauranga (the Annual Reports on Maori Education)