Home > Resources > PPTA News > Proposed registration changes
Proposed registration changes Print E-mail

PPTA News November 2009 tchr registration iconFlagging the snags

PPTA News November 2009, p. 12

The Teachers Council is consulting the profession on some proposals for changes in teacher registration.

Matters of concern

1. What is a “teaching position”?

The biggest issue in the consultation is a proposal to revise the council’s definition of “a teaching position”. The revised wording says it, “Involves holding the prime responsibility for the planning, implementation, assessment, evaluation and reporting of a sequential programme of learning (sustained, full cycle of teaching and learning, length to be determined)” and “enables appraisal against all the Satisfactory Teacher Dimension/ Registered Teacher Criteria”.

The problem is that neither the previous definition nor this proposal is sufficiently flexible to cover all the non-standard roles that secondary teachers hold now and may hold in the future. For example, it appears to not apply to guidance counsellors, careers advisors, resource teachers learning and behaviour (RTLBs), even non-teaching senior managers.

It is simply not going to do the job. These people have been appointed to teaching positions, and can’t be just removed from them by the Teachers Council redefining what a teaching position is.

2. Categories of registration

The council is also proposing to make a new distinction between registration and holding a practising certificate. It suggests three categories of full practising certificate: in a teaching position, “in transition”, or “allied teacher”, i.e. working in a learning institution but not in a teaching position.

PPTA’s concern about this is that although the council suggests that the teaching practitioner role could include professional leaders and resource teachers, despite the fact that they may well not do any classroom teaching, “some guidance counsellors” (presumably the teaching qualifi ed ones, which is the vast majority) appear likely to be relegated to the “allied teacher” practising certifi cate category.

Why there should be a distinction made among these groups is not clear. For a perspective on the signifi cant contribution that guidance counsellors make to the development of the key competencies in the New Zealand Curriculum, read an article by Colin Hughes, HoD guidance at Trident High School.

3. What is recent teaching experience?

Another proposal that may concern teachers is to change the definition of “recent teaching experience” for the purposes of maintaining a full practising certifi cate, currently two years in the last five, to a more demanding requirement of one year in the last three. The council’s argument for this is around the speed of change in education and the need to be assured that a person with a full practising certificate is up to date. Someone re-entering teaching after a period of over two years would be placed in the “subject to confirmation” category, in today’s parlance, or the “transitional” category if the proposal discussed above was adopted, and would then have a reduced period of “advice and guidance” before being recommended for a full practising certifi cate again.

4. How long should a teacher be provisionally registered?

A less contentious proposal is to limit provisional registration to three years, with a right to apply for a further three years if the beginning teacher is “making satisfactory progress towards meeting all of the Satisfactory Teacher Dimension/ Registered Teacher Criteria”.

This would mean that someone who failed to achieve full registration after six years, or was making insufficient progress towards it after three, would have to leave the teaching profession. Teachers may be surprised to learn that for some years now, due to a glitch in writing the legislation that set up the Teachers Council, there has been no upper limit on the time a teacher could stay provisionally

 

pdf icon Download PPTA submission to Teachers Council

pdf icon PPTA News November 2009

Comments (2)add comment

bronwyn said:

The purpose of teacher registratration
The answer is yes - all other profesional bodies have registration requirements - doctors, nurses, vets, accountants, lawyers... any group of employees that are in positions that might potentially allow them to abuse the trust the public must have in them. It certainly would deter people who are not appropriately trained or qualified or who who have failed a police vet from entering the service but that is exactly the intention. Some boards of trustees pay registration for their staff but it's not mandatory and when it was discussed at Annual Conference in 2006, delegates felt that the advantage of teachers paying was that it meant that they "owned" the Teachers Council (which is the body that manages registration and on which teachers have elected representatives). For a more extensive discussion, see the 2006 conference paper on the topic here: http://www.ppta.org.nz/index.p...-reviewed
 
December 08, 2009
Votes: +0

maria leyden said:

teacher registration
Why do Teachers have to pay to register in NZ? Is this common amoungst professional bodies. I find it strange that even though you are qualified, you still have to pay to practice. Surely this will put of a lot of people entering the profession. I think it should be scrapped or paid for by the employer, any one else agree
 
November 30, 2009
Votes: +0

Write comment

busy